TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI B450 Tomahawk

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 Tomahawk  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840x2160x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '23 at 20:19
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 212
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 684
67% 549 Pts
64-Core 1,063
66% 1,063 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑
This bench: 79.9%
 Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Gigabyte(1458 404C)
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Lighting 228
Reflection 211
Parallax 203
186% 214 fps
MRender 202
Gravity 154
Splatting 137
131% 164 fps
Poor: 135% ↑
This bench: 154%
 Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,543
Write 2,296
Mixed 1,468
467% 2,103 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 77.1
257% 87.8 MB/s
DQ Read 910
DQ Write 684
DQ Mixed 762
579% 785 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
716GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 478 478 478 478 479 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 478
Mixed 459
SusWrite 475
108% 478 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 51.2
167% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 369
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑
This bench: 118%
 Great: 133%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$97
514GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 145 146 144 145 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 165
Write 176
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 145
97% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
138% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 88.8%
 Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX KHX3000C15D4/8GX KF3200C16D4/8GX KHX3000C15D4/8GX 32GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 35.2
107% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.6
SC Write 39.6
SC Mixed 31.7
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 104%
 Great: 104%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical B450 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 7,360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 Tomahawk - $130

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples1,759x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples1,097x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD  $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples867x
GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia  $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples562x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples476x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia  $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples344x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples439x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples304x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel  $70Bench 191%, 163,917 samples236x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples666x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples426x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $32Bench 84%, 287,720 samples248x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $687
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback