Asrock H97 Anniversary

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H97 Anniversary  (all builds)
Memory20.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150723
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateMar 09 '23 at 04:57
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 91.8
2-Core 177
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 325
42% 317 Pts
64-Core 325
20% 325 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.4% Above average
Lighting 69.5
Reflection 75.2
Parallax 68.2
57% 71 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 72
Splatting 67
56% 68.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKQ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 335 350 373 375 373 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 341
Write 325
Mixed 322
SusWrite 332
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 34.5
119% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 192
170% 251 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 102%
PNY CS900 480GB-$35
447GB free
Firmware: CS900208
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 297 335 351 352 353 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 363
Write 358
Mixed 291
SusWrite 314
75% 331 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 27.2
112% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 166
164% 260 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
404GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 114 113 114 115 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 115
Write 111
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 111
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 69%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 153 154 155 155 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 141
Mixed 99
SusWrite 152
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 189 183 186 186 183 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97 Anniversary Builds (Compare 538 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97 Anniversary

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback