Asrock H97 Anniversary

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics61.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H97 Anniversary  (all builds)
Memory20.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150723
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 06 '23 at 05:15
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 180
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 295
38% 285 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2202 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.7% Good
Lighting 76.6
Reflection 80.3
Parallax 73.4
62% 76.8 fps
MRender 74.4
Gravity 76.2
Splatting 71.1
60% 73.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKQ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 353 356 382 378 377 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 146
Write 64.9
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 343
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 9.9
42% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 13.1
DQ Write 12.9
DQ Mixed 12.9
10% 13 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 102%
PNY CS900 480GB-$35
447GB free
Firmware: CS900208
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 304 349 336 364 340 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
80% Very good
Read 291
Write 97.6
Mixed 230
SusWrite 318
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 28.1
117% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 164
163% 258 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
437GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 115 117 116 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 119
Write 113
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 115
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 69%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 153 154 155 155 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 127
Mixed 87.1
SusWrite 153
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 190 184 185 185 194 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 64GB
60GB free, PID c75c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 1.7 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 6.5
SusWrite 5.8
10% 6.15 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Mixed 0
195% 17.5 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
52.6% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97 Anniversary Builds (Compare 538 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97 Anniversary

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback