Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR_FX517ZR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR_FX517ZR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX517ZR
Memory40.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220617
Uptime10.4 Days
Run DateMar 07 '23 at 14:49
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12650H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
40.8% Average
Memory 55.8
1-Core 96.8
2-Core 198
63% 117 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 115
19% 137 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 136D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1278
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.6% Below average
Lighting 30.7
Reflection 41.3
Parallax 30
25% 34 fps
MRender 69.7
Gravity 50.2
Splatting 46.4
44% 55.4 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1314 206 130 135 128 285 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,940
Write 1302
Mixed 1,082
SusWrite 366
260% 1,173 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 61.3
167% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 430
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 386
288% 384 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 171%
Great: 297%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
925GB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1716 1579 1685 1639 1526 1587 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 847
Write 1,424
Mixed 1,046
SusWrite 1,622
281% 1,235 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 43.6
134% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 439
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 398
298% 398 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 193%
Great: 299%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM4800ASE-32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 55.2
MC Write 60.9
MC Mixed 27
136% 47.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 18.5
54% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 119%
This bench: 119%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR_FX517ZR Builds (Compare 1,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR_FX517ZR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback