Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX707ZE_FX707ZE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics21% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive297% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX707ZE_FX707ZE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX707ZE
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '23 at 15:37
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 72.3
1-Core 188
2-Core 369
109% 210 Pts
4-Core 693
8-Core 1,165
113% 929 Pts
64-Core 1,893
117% 1,893 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 101%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1D4C) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
21% Poor
Lighting 24.8
Reflection 85.8
Parallax 28.6
20% 46.4 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 35
Splatting 22.6
22% 28 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1222 1101 1158 1251 1228 540 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 2,440
Write 1,514
Mixed 1,273
SusWrite 1,083
351% 1,578 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 99.4
317% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 450
DQ Write 1,077
DQ Mixed 404
411% 644 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 297%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOL 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
73.1% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 25.4
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 21
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 96.1
42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX707ZE_FX707ZE Builds (Compare 134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX707ZE_FX707ZE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback