Acer Nitro AN515-58

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-58  (all builds)
MotherboardADL Jimny_ADH
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230412
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '24 at 21:47
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12650H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 74.4
1-Core 184
2-Core 362
108% 207 Pts
4-Core 689
8-Core 1,183
113% 936 Pts
64-Core 1658
103% 1658 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 159C) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5081
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 24.3
Parallax 19.5
14% 20.4 fps
MRender 21.1
Gravity 24.6
Splatting 17.7
17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SHPP41-2000GM 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51060A20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,634
Write 4,174
Mixed 2,353
825% 3,720 MB/s
4K Read 67.4
4K Write 234
4K Mixed 98
352% 133 MB/s
DQ Read 1,251
DQ Write 931
DQ Mixed 1,058
800% 1,080 MB/s
Poor: 263% Great: 661%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 128
Write 131
Mixed 67.9
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66MEBSA095N 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 50.6
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 44.3
132% 46.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 43.3
SC Mixed 27.5
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 122%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0B02
Typical Nitro AN515-58 Builds (Compare 4,492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Acer Nitro AN515-58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback