Performance Results

Gaming 102%
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 106%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive494% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Katana 17 B12VGK
MotherboardMSI MS-17L5  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231002
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '24 at 10:46
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12650H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 70.2
1-Core 168
2-Core 312
97% 184 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 1,018
97% 804 Pts
64-Core 1,565
97% 1,565 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 13C8) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver.
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (138 fps cap detected)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 138
Parallax 138
112% 138 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 138
Splatting 106
102% 127 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 107%
Great: 152%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1032 1TB
635GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 74116000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3171 3132 2987 3070 3053 3000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
494% Outstanding
Read 3,761
Write 2,956
Mixed 2,094
SusWrite 3,069
666% 2,970 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 88.1
314% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,441
DQ Write 1,247
DQ Mixed 1,296
984% 1,328 MB/s
Poor: 250%
This bench: 494%
Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66AGBSA095N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
118% Outstanding
MC Read 51.5
MC Write 41.5
MC Mixed 43.8
130% 45.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 39.2
SC Mixed 24.1
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 118%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 23: 0P 1R 3G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
23% 36% 36 98 59 144 17.3" 1920 1009 BOE09A4
Typical MS-17L5 Builds (Compare 944 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 21%
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 21%

Motherboard: MSI MS-17L5

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback