MSI Z270 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A59)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A59
MotherboardMSI Z270 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A59)  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161201
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 16 '17 at 17:23
Run Duration284 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 88.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 213
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 422
56% 419 Pts
64-Core 421
26% 421 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Zotac(19DA 5294) 2GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.33
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 21.3
14% 18.3 fps
MRender 22.3
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 15.3
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 17% Great: 97%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
165GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 102
Mixed 92.6
72% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.26
75% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 74%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
69GB free
Firmware: 0304
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 58.2
Write 68.6
Mixed 58.7
46% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 0.93
4K Mixed 0.31
68% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$23
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 121
Write 102
Mixed 109
84% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.3
91% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 70%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
90GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
63% Good
Read 120
Write 98.9
Mixed 94
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 2.24
4K Mixed 0.24
103% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63%
Great: 85%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
931GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 37.1
Mixed 19.6
38% 31 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.2
65% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 45%
WD A MQ01A External 320GB
37GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.4% Very poor
Read 39.6
Write 42.9
Mixed 31.7
49% 38.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.18
54% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$25
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
45.3% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 13.5
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A59) Builds (Compare 717 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A59) - $146

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $723
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback