| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1494 |
| Memory | 0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20111110 |
| Uptime | 10.1 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 01 '22 at 11:19 |
| Run Duration | 229 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
64.7%
Good
|
64% 114 Pts
|
47% 351 Pts
|
22% 349 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1494) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
0.63%
Terrible
|
0% 0.77 fps
|
1% 1.23 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$30
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20.01H20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 61 75 66 43 MB/s
|
20.8%
Poor
|
19% 25.9 MB/s
|
24% 0.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
22.4%
Poor
|
22% 7.83 GB/s
|
12% 4.1 GB/s
|
38% 105 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,758 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 684x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 590x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 314x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 423x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 137x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 85x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |