Supermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180523
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 31 '22 at 17:24
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 179
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 663
62% 518 Pts
64-Core 1,912
118% 1,912 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
HP(103C 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.22
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.93% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 10.7
5% 8.73 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 14.1
10% 12.5 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 6.93%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31256GTND 256GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 138 115 74 46 57 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.9% Average
Read 271
Write 105
Mixed 108
SusWrite 111
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 20.1
71% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 61.1
DQ Write 85.7
DQ Mixed 115
75% 87.3 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 90%
Hs-ssd-e100 128G 128GB
96GB free
Firmware: SN7872
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 228 224 224 225 226 MB/s
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.1% Good
Read 244
Write 224
Mixed 227
SusWrite 227
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 28.5
97% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 178
131% 170 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
39GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 106 107 105 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
60% Good
Read 102
Write 95.1
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 107
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 60%
Great: 69%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 64GB
11GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 1.3 18 16 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 63.6
Write 17
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 11.6
31% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
35% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 36JSF1G72PZ-1G9K1 36JSF1G72PZ-1G9K1 18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.9% Above average
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 17.3
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.3
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $583
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback