Supermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSupermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180523
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateDec 30 '22 at 13:48
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 197
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 755
67% 567 Pts
64-Core 1,912
118% 1,912 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
HP(103C 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Lighting 13.4
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 11
11% 13.3 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 14.4
11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31256GTND 256GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 167 116 56 69 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 428
Write 202
Mixed 326
SusWrite 113
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 34.1
112% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 202
175% 257 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 90%
Hs-ssd-e100 128G 128GB
89GB free
Firmware: SN7872
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 226 220 220 221 223 MB/s
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.9% Above average
Read 233
Write 218
Mixed 226
SusWrite 223
51% 225 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 29
95% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 173
127% 166 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
39GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 107 107 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 102
Write 103
Mixed 66
SusWrite 107
69% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 69%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 64GB
11GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 18 9.1 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 62.1
Write 19
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 13
32% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.6
88% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 36JSF1G72PZ-1G9K1 36JSF1G72PZ-1G9K1 18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55% Above average
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 18
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6.8
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $583
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback