Supermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '22 at 14:08
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 174
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 676
63% 527 Pts
64-Core 1,877
116% 1,877 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
HP(103C 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 10.6
10% 12.7 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 13
Splatting 13.9
10% 12.5 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31256GTND 256GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 171 107 41 64 103 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.4% Below average
Read 246
Write 106
Mixed 102
SusWrite 139
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 25.5
4K Mixed 16
60% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 33.4
DQ Write 38.5
DQ Mixed 36.3
27% 36.1 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 90%
Hs-ssd-e100 128G 128GB
94GB free
Firmware: SN7872
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 235 228 230 229 228 MB/s
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.9% Good
Read 247
Write 232
Mixed 234
SusWrite 232
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 28.6
106% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 175
129% 169 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
39GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 107 107 105 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 102
Write 99.2
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 106
69% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 69%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 64GB
11GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 7.2 14 14 15 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 99.8
Write 15.2
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 12.1
34% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
52% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 36JSF1G72PZ-1G9K1 36JSF1G72PZ-1G9K1 18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47% Average
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 15.3
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6.7
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 47%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $583
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback