Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z87-D3HP
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130417
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateOct 29 '22 at 10:20
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 0.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 98.2
1-Core 14.6
2-Core 42.2
41% 51.7 Pts
4-Core 42.2
8-Core 60.7
6% 51.5 Pts
64-Core 73.7
5% 73.7 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.5% Poor
Lighting 26.8
Reflection 35.3
Parallax 30.5
22% 30.9 fps
MRender 39.4
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 32.1
30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gamer 240MG100-B1 240GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 193 209 198 162 174 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 430
Write 341
Mixed 314
SusWrite 190
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 23.3
88% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 133
97% 126 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
585GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 113 124 128 100 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 155
Write 145
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 116
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
230% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 111 118 121 102 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 121
Write 83.3
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 111
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
829GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 112 111 96 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 120
Write 73.7
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 104
69% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
208% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
658GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 82 81 73 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 91.7
Write 54.7
Mixed 70.9
SusWrite 76.6
55% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 84%
Toshiba HDWG440 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0601
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 117 129 132 109 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 219
Write 209
Mixed 113
SusWrite 121
122% 166 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.8
183% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2400C11-8GXM 0420 F3-2400C10-8GTX 0420 F3-2400C11-8GXM 0420 F3-2400C10-8GTX 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
22.3% Poor
MC Read 2.1
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 4.4
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 3.5
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 45.1
89% 45.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87-D3HP-CF Builds (Compare 825 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback