Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z87-D3HP
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF  (all builds)
Memory19.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130417
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 22 '22 at 12:47
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
36.7% Below average
Memory 60.8
1-Core 23.8
2-Core 50
31% 44.9 Pts
4-Core 78.4
8-Core 60.1
10% 69.2 Pts
64-Core 79.4
5% 79.4 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.3% Poor
Lighting 23.7
Reflection 34.7
Parallax 30.1
19% 29.5 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 36.1
Splatting 30.1
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gamer 240MG100-B1 240GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 208 236 195 183 241 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.2% Below average
Read 193
Write 207
Mixed 188
SusWrite 208
45% 199 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 11.6
31% 9.6 MB/s
DQ Read 64.7
DQ Write 61.6
DQ Mixed 101
66% 75.8 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
585GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 128 135 136 124 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 141
Write 136
Mixed 88.3
SusWrite 131
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 126 130 130 119 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 103
Write 103
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 124
73% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
829GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 117 120 119 110 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 80.2
Write 108
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 116
67% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
658GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 84 84 85 80 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 80.2
Write 80.6
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 82.2
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 84%
Toshiba HDWG440 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0601
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 135 140 139 127 142 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 176
Mixed 97.4
SusWrite 135
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
207% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2400C11-8GXM 0420 F3-2400C10-8GTX 0420 F3-2400C11-8GXM 0420 F3-2400C10-8GTX 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
20.4% Poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 5
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87-D3HP-CF Builds (Compare 825 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback