Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z87-D3HP
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130417
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateOct 24 '22 at 18:23
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 95.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 149
73% 117 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 426
44% 351 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.5% Poor
Lighting 28.5
Reflection 36.5
Parallax 32.4
23% 32.5 fps
MRender 40.5
Gravity 38.9
Splatting 32.2
30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gamer 240MG100-B1 240GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 265 184 33 13 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 434
Write 341
Mixed 317
SusWrite 129
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 42.4
129% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 193
170% 257 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
585GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 145 143 144 144 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 136
Write 145
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 143
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
241% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 139 138 136 142 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 121
Write 133
Mixed 89.9
SusWrite 138
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
829GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 126 125 125 128 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 117
Write 116
Mixed 64.9
SusWrite 125
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
658GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 87 87 89 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 90.1
Write 87.2
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 87.6
62% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 84%
Toshiba HDWG440 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0601
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 145 144 144 147 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 209
Write 209
Mixed 110
SusWrite 144
123% 168 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.9
202% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 101%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2400C11-8GXM 0420 F3-2400C10-8GTX 0420 F3-2400C11-8GXM 0420 F3-2400C10-8GTX 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 25.8
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 24.5
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 54.6
73% 54.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87-D3HP-CF Builds (Compare 825 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback