Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics23.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z87-D3HP
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF  (all builds)
Memory16.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130417
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 22 '22 at 14:39
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Memory 34.9
1-Core 26.6
2-Core 59
24% 40.2 Pts
4-Core 85.8
8-Core 89.2
12% 87.5 Pts
64-Core 79.9
5% 79.9 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.2% Poor
Lighting 25.7
Reflection 34.4
Parallax 29.4
21% 29.8 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 35.7
Splatting 29.8
28% 34.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gamer 240MG100-B1 240GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 189 227 208 220 228 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
40% Average
Read 303
Write 286
Mixed 302
SusWrite 202
62% 273 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 9.2
38% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 92
DQ Write 92.2
DQ Mixed 110
78% 98.1 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 40%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
585GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 117 131 125 133 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 125
Write 140
Mixed 80.4
SusWrite 123
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
230% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 112 120 119 126 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 130
Write 69.7
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 117
72% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
829GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 92 102 99 103 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 103
Write 68
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 97.2
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
658GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 79 82 80 84 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 89
Write 59
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 79.4
55% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 84%
Toshiba HDWG440 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0601
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 123 133 132 136 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 174
Write 175
Mixed 89.9
SusWrite 127
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2400C11-8GXM 0420 F3-2400C10-8GTX 0420 F3-2400C11-8GXM 0420 F3-2400C10-8GTX 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
22% Poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 5.6
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.5
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 227
18% 227 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 22%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87-D3HP-CF Builds (Compare 825 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback