Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z87-D3HP
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130417
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 23 '22 at 07:34
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 82.1
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 104
53% 82.1 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 186
22% 169 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.8% Poor
Lighting 29
Reflection 36.5
Parallax 32.4
24% 32.6 fps
MRender 40.7
Gravity 39.2
Splatting 32.3
30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gamer 240MG100-B1 240GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 308 251 275 286 290 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 391
Write 400
Mixed 340
SusWrite 273
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 37.9
127% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 190
145% 198 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
585GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 143 142 143 141 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 131
Write 147
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 140
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
243% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 138 137 139 138 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 125
Write 131
Mixed 90.6
SusWrite 135
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
829GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 123 126 123 125 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
67% Good
Read 110
Write 79.3
Mixed 71.4
SusWrite 123
71% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
658GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 86 87 87 87 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 82.1
Write 60.1
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 85.3
55% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 84%
Toshiba HDWG440 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0601
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 145 143 144 143 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 221
Write 204
Mixed 115
SusWrite 141
125% 170 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.9
200% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 104%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2400C11-8GXM 0420 F3-2400C10-8GTX 0420 F3-2400C11-8GXM 0420 F3-2400C10-8GTX 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
70.8% Very good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 24.9
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 18.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87-D3HP-CF Builds (Compare 825 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback