Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 201%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 195%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics207% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ULTRA
MotherboardGigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190314
Uptime7.6 Days
Run DateOct 25 '22 at 08:28
Run Duration314 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Memory 96.3
1-Core 143
2-Core 283
97% 174 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 905
89% 727 Pts
64-Core 1,476
91% 1,476 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
207% Outstanding
Lighting 306
Reflection 267
Parallax 303
250% 292 fps
MRender 340
Gravity 248
Splatting 181
201% 256 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 207%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,180
Write 1262
Mixed 1,008
257% 1,150 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 52.1
164% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 679
DQ Write 641
DQ Mixed 273
311% 531 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 295%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
311GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 412 412 430 439 442 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 412
Write 448
Mixed 325
SusWrite 425
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 36.4
126% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 180
155% 222 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 107%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
284GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 430 426 440 441 435 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 460
Mixed 459
SusWrite 435
104% 464 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 51.1
166% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 355
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%
PNY CS1030 2TB SSD
357GB free
Firmware: CS103500
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1681 1626 284 41 44 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,024
Write 1,718
Mixed 1,052
SusWrite 620
250% 1,104 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 54.5
180% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,016
DQ Write 599
DQ Mixed 850
621% 822 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 171%
Great: 308%
Toshiba HDWR11A 10TB
563GB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 98 95 72 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 17.7
Write 18
Mixed 16
SusWrite 82.9
24% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
13% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 135%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
286GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 179 183 182 182 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 128
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 181
97% 134 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.2
306% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
118GB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 134 132 130 131 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 88.5
Write 110
Mixed 113
SusWrite 132
83% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.7
196% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 94%
TOSHIBA HDWE150 5TB
896GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 119 117 120 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 112
Write 112
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 119
129% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
113% 2 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 52%
WD Elements 25A3 14TB
2TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 133 125 130 129 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 132
Write 132
Mixed 129
SusWrite 130
179% 131 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 2.1
419% 5.23 MB/s
DQ Read 2.3
DQ Write 9.6
DQ Mixed 1.7
393% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 103%
TOSHIBA HDWR180 8TB
136GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 119 117 120 120 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.7% Average
Read 146
Write 63.8
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 119
115% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.9
60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 29.1
98% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 26.2
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 53
76% 53 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ULTRA-CF Builds (Compare 7,822 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra - $172

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback