| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding. |
| Graphics | 164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 67.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
| Motherboard | Asrock H410M-HVS R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20210729 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 26 '22 at 09:23 |
| Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-10900F-$240
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
|
103%
Outstanding
|
100% 183 Pts
|
101% 843 Pts
|
103% 1,670 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$449
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
164%
Outstanding
|
199% 226 fps
|
142% 182 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Q3DT-120GSCY 120GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0524A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 70 7.2 168 44 20 MB/s
|
67.5%
Good
|
73% 325 MB/s
|
123% 51.5 MB/s
|
73% 147 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
98GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 103 109 109 116 114 MB/s
|
68.1%
Good
|
72% 99.9 MB/s
|
146% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown R7S44G2606U1S 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
67.8%
Good
|
64% 22.4 GB/s
|
73% 25.6 GB/s
|
68% 58.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 32: 6R 0G 2B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32% | 35% | 23 | 106 | 1 | 60 | 32" | 1920 1080 | GDH0030 Digital TV |
Typical H410M-HVS R2.0 Builds (Compare 228 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H410M-HVS R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-10400FIntel $95Bench 85%, 153,026 samples | 80x |
| Core i3-10105FIntelBench 82%, 14,843 samples | 41x |
| Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples | 29x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 37,718 samples | 28x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 23x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 21x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 114% - Outstanding | Total price: $95 |