Asrock H410M-HVS R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H410M-HVS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210729
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 11:15
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900F-$240
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 70.1
1-Core 43.5
2-Core 86.9
43% 66.8 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 336
30% 255 Pts
64-Core 579
36% 579 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$449
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 148
Reflection 211
Parallax 193
121% 184 fps
MRender 242
Gravity 135
Splatting 124
131% 167 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 120%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Q3DT-120GSCY 120GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0524A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 56 46 17 2 225 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 424
Write 407
Mixed 389
SusWrite 74.1
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 17.6
91% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 51.1
DQ Mixed 0.6
27% 67.4 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 82%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
99GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 114 116 107 117 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 122
Write 125
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 113
70% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R7S44G2606U1S 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
43.4% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 15.1
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 11.5
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H410M-HVS R2.0 Builds (Compare 228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H410M-HVS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback