Asrock H410M-HVS R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 160%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 164%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H410M-HVS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '22 at 20:52
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900F-$240
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 156
2-Core 307
101% 186 Pts
4-Core 588
8-Core 1,067
99% 827 Pts
64-Core 1,687
104% 1,687 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 101%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$449
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
164% Outstanding
Lighting 243
Reflection 218
Parallax 212
198% 224 fps
MRender 257
Gravity 160
Splatting 130
143% 182 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 164%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Q3DT-120GSCY 120GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0524A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 21 104 78 17 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 474
Write 379
Mixed 375
SusWrite 90.3
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 18.9
125% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 30.5
77% 154 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 82%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
242GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 139 144 151 149 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 145
Write 130
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 146
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 103%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
8GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.4 2.6 3.9 5.5 7.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 31.2
Write 12.7
SusWrite 4.3
16% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.5
69% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R7S44G2606U1S 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.1% Above average
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.1
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 21.2
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H410M-HVS R2.0 Builds (Compare 228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H410M-HVS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback