Asrock H410M-HVS R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H410M-HVS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 11:28
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900F-$240
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 159
2-Core 303
101% 185 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 1,088
101% 844 Pts
64-Core 1,672
104% 1,672 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 102%
Great: 103%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Q3DT-120GSCY 120GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0524A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 105 35 6.2 172 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 458
Write 396
Mixed 382
SusWrite 83.5
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 18.3
113% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 28.7
74% 149 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 82%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
99GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 117 117 117 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 133
Write 119
Mixed 30
SusWrite 115
72% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R7S44G2606U1S 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.6% Good
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 17.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 22.4
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H410M-HVS R2.0 Builds (Compare 228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H410M-HVS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback