Asrock H410M-HVS R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 158%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 164%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H410M-HVS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 11:31
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900F-$240
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 159
2-Core 310
102% 187 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 1,108
100% 842 Pts
64-Core 1,678
104% 1,678 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$449
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
164% Outstanding
Lighting 243
Reflection 220
Parallax 212
198% 225 fps
MRender 257
Gravity 162
Splatting 129
143% 182 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 164%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Q3DT-120GSCY 120GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0524A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 73 20 107 72 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 454
Write 403
Mixed 388
SusWrite 83.2
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 17
118% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 91.3
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 29.2
73% 146 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 82%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
99GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 115 111 117 117 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 122
Write 133
Mixed 30
SusWrite 115
72% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R7S44G2606U1S 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.6% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 17.8
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 34.7
SC Mixed 22.8
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H410M-HVS R2.0 Builds (Compare 228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H410M-HVS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback