Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z690 FORMULA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 123%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS Z690 FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory47.2 GB free of 64 GB
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '22 at 02:18
Run Duration512 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 91%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900KS-$323
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
123% Outstanding
Memory 80.4
1-Core 220
2-Core 439
126% 247 Pts
4-Core 880
8-Core 1725
154% 1,302 Pts
64-Core 3,099
192% 3,099 Pts
Poor: 103%
This bench: 123%
Great: 128%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 512.15
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 331
Reflection 317
Parallax 378
270% 342 fps
Gravity 272
Splatting 202
205% 237 fps
Poor: 185% Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Expansion Desk 16TB
130GB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.58% Terrible
Read 36.7
Write 29.9
Mixed 30.4
SusWrite 41.2
8% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 0.9
20% 6.33 MB/s
DQ Read 1.6
DQ Write 5.5
DQ Mixed 1.2
2% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.58%
Great: 38%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,754
Write 2,500
Mixed 1,905
531% 2,386 MB/s
4K Read 75.9
4K Write 233
4K Mixed 109
378% 139 MB/s
DQ Read 1,591
DQ Write 1,310
DQ Mixed 1,412
1,068% 1,438 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
10GB free
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 483
Write 486
Mixed 417
103% 462 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 55
181% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 343
259% 347 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 131%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
8GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 370
Write 400
Mixed 353
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 49.9
174% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 169
142% 207 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
1GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 502
Write 478
Mixed 461
107% 480 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 60.5
204% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 16.2
DQ Write 4.5
DQ Mixed 7.3
6% 9.33 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$152
37GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,552
Write 2,014
Mixed 1,643
459% 2,069 MB/s
4K Read 69.7
4K Write 215
4K Mixed 103
351% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 1,776
DQ Write 1,452
DQ Mixed 1,585
1,195% 1,605 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
ICY BOX 16TB
3TB free
Firmware: 9122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 188 187 187 188 191 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.4% Below average
Read 212
Write 200
Mixed 188
SusWrite 188
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 1.4
41% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 5.6
DQ Write 10.1
DQ Mixed 0.4
2% 5.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 38%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$247
19GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 511
Write 486
Mixed 466
109% 488 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 94.4
4K Mixed 53.8
180% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 341
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 89% Great: 133%
ST16000NM001G-2KK103 16TB
2TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 155 159 159 159 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 147
Write 142
Mixed 97.8
SusWrite 154
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 0.8
48% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 2.3
DQ Write 13.4
DQ Mixed 2.4
4% 6.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 45%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
7GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 494
Write 419
Mixed 424
99% 445 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 50.8
167% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 340
256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$82
96GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 66 70 73 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 111
Write 108
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 70.6
67% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$82
117GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 102 101 104 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
56% Above average
Read 93.3
Write 89.2
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 101
66% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$82
207GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 111 113 113 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 108
Write 104
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 112
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$82
112GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 114 108 113 118 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 83.8
Write 71.7
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 113
59% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
260GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 108 113 117 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 92.1
Write 94.9
Mixed 68
SusWrite 113
68% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.6
217% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
12GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 94 86 89 88 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 42.6
Write 76
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 86.9
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.5
191% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 90%
SAMSUNG HD103SJ 1TB
5GB free, PID 1018
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 34 33 33 33 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 30.9
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 34
42% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 24%
ST16000N M001G-2KK103 16TB
14TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 217 221 224 243 237 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 232
Write 200
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 224
225% 174 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 0.4
312% 6.77 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 108%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX5M2X6200C36 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6200 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
189% Outstanding
MC Read 77.9
MC Write 75.7
MC Mixed 70.4
213% 74.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 48.9
SC Mixed 33.2
100% 35.2 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 126%
This bench: 189%
Great: 210%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS Z690 FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,094 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 239%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 280%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z690 FORMULA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,693
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback