Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160324
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 04 '22 at 15:37
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 77.3
2-Core 151
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 325
38% 295 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E221) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23% Poor
Lighting 28.3
Reflection 38.6
Parallax 37.4
23% 34.8 fps
MRender 31.8
Gravity 26.8
Splatting 26.1
23% 28.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA15.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 143 112 107 72 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 407
Write 112
Mixed 223
SusWrite 114
47% 214 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 36.1
131% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 133
111% 162 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
247GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 91 103 97 134 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 138
Write 133
Mixed 96.4
SusWrite 112
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Corsair CML4GX3M1A1600C9 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
46.7% Average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $377
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback