Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '22 at 16:49
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 81.1
2-Core 159
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 351
40% 315 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E221) 2GB
CLim: 920 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 24.8
Reflection 34.2
Parallax 32.8
20% 30.6 fps
MRender 28.1
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 23
20% 24.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA15.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 166 107 145 120 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 357
Write 108
Mixed 196
SusWrite 163
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 36
130% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 179
145% 204 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 74%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
247GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 89 103 94 134 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 134
Write 130
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 110
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Corsair CML4GX3M1A1600C9 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
45.8% Average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $377
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback