Asus A88XM-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
MotherboardAsus A88XM-A  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '22 at 17:15
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Memory 49.1
1-Core 34.2
2-Core 43.7
29% 42.3 Pts
4-Core 73.9
8-Core 81.4
10% 77.7 Pts
64-Core 80.9
5% 80.9 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
2.77% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 4.8
3% 4.1 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.77%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$32
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 95 96 93 94 98 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43% Average
Read 244
Write 76.7
Mixed 113
SusWrite 93.9
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 22
69% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 80.8
DQ Mixed 116
90% 127 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
839GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 160 162 160 165 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 117
Write 122
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 162
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Corsair CML4GX3M1A1600C9 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 6.7
16% 5.77 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3.8
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-A Builds (Compare 378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-A - $62

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback