Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 18 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170908
Uptime9.1 Days
Run DateJul 04 '22 at 07:52
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 65.8
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 197
67% 121 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 663
63% 523 Pts
64-Core 973
60% 973 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.8% Average
Lighting 53.8
Reflection 59.9
Parallax 54.4
44% 56 fps
MRender 54.3
Gravity 60.4
Splatting 48
44% 54.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
69GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 232 176 156 143 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 464
Mixed 390
SusWrite 195
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 46.6
156% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 230
209% 318 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 118%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 874 707 727 687 678 668 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 2,095
Write 945
Mixed 791
SusWrite 723
251% 1,138 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 51
170% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 719
DQ Write 482
DQ Mixed 615
455% 605 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 207%
Great: 353%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
74GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 59 63 72 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 78.6
Write 82
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 63.3
56% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 67%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
413GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 97 98 99 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
63% Good
Read 127
Write 125
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 92.2
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63%
Great: 83%
FV-U35 1TB
336GB free, PID ce12
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 35 38 38 39 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 38.4
Write 37.9
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 37.5
49% 36.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.1% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 22.9
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 21.1
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $1,046
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback