Asrock X370 Professional Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics81.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive325% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370 Professional Gaming  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180718
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 26 '22 at 18:01
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 69.7
1-Core 111
2-Core 222
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 782
70% 593 Pts
64-Core 1055
65% 1055 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 473.62
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.2% Excellent
Lighting 100
Reflection 111
Parallax 101
82% 104 fps
MRender 95.5
Gravity 99.2
Splatting 98.2
80% 97.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
278GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2270 773 773 775 770 773 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
325% Outstanding
Read 2,683
Write 2433
Mixed 1,895
SusWrite 1,022
449% 2,008 MB/s
4K Read 73.5
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 103
343% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,212
DQ Write 949
DQ Mixed 1,010
775% 1,057 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 325%
Great: 340%
Adata XPG SX8000 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$236
109GB free
Firmware: C2.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 555 466 365 368 370 414 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 639
Write 392
Mixed 412
SusWrite 423
104% 466 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 38.5
142% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 221
167% 222 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 105%
Great: 184%
WD Blue 500GB-$94
413GB free
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 304 304 304 305 304 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 471
Mixed 346
SusWrite 324
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 43.6
148% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 246
193% 266 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 169 164 171 169 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 150
Mixed 87.3
SusWrite 170
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
829GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 134 135 134 135 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 138
Write 43.3
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 135
71% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.2
228% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
393GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 141 160 155 161 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 140
Mixed 83.1
SusWrite 153
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3400C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.4% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 25.2
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 24.4
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Professional Gaming

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $966
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback