Asrock X370 Professional Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive310% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370 Professional Gaming  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '22 at 21:25
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 70.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 225
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 763
69% 582 Pts
64-Core 1,058
66% 1,058 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 473.62
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.9% Excellent
Lighting 100
Reflection 110
Parallax 100
82% 104 fps
MRender 95.5
Gravity 98.3
Splatting 96.9
79% 96.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
281GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2202 735 691 755 778 762 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
310% Outstanding
Read 2,643
Write 2,405
Mixed 1,868
SusWrite 987
442% 1,976 MB/s
4K Read 71.5
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 97.5
322% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,062
DQ Write 905
DQ Mixed 972
732% 980 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 310%
Great: 340%
Adata XPG SX8000 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$236
109GB free
Firmware: C2.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 554 509 367 359 348 323 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 664
Write 688
Mixed 618
SusWrite 410
134% 595 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 41.4
149% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 454
DQ Mixed 398
293% 378 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 114%
Great: 184%
WD Blue 500GB-$94
413GB free
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 304 304 304 305 302 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 491
Write 470
Mixed 345
SusWrite 323
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 30.7
112% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 246
193% 266 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 167 159 164 175 188 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 151
Mixed 87.3
SusWrite 169
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 105%
Great: 114%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
829GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 134 133 133 135 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 126
Write 144
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 134
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.3
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
393GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 159 151 146 151 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 141
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 155
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3400C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.9% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 26
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 23.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Professional Gaming

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $963
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback