Asrock X370 Professional Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive330% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370 Professional Gaming  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '22 at 21:35
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 80
1-Core 106
2-Core 223
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 746
69% 574 Pts
64-Core 1,056
65% 1,056 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 473.62
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.9% Excellent
Lighting 100
Reflection 110
Parallax 99.7
82% 103 fps
MRender 95.4
Gravity 98.8
Splatting 97.3
80% 97.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
281GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2237 779 777 779 776 777 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
330% Outstanding
Read 2,714
Write 2,450
Mixed 1,886
SusWrite 1,021
451% 2,018 MB/s
4K Read 75.3
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 106
351% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,269
DQ Write 982
DQ Mixed 1,049
805% 1,100 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 330%
Great: 340%
Adata XPG SX8000 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$236
109GB free
Firmware: C2.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 526 392 348 363 372 287 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 678
Write 776
Mixed 670
SusWrite 382
141% 626 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 48
170% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 430
DQ Mixed 426
307% 391 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 120%
Great: 184%
WD Blue 500GB-$93
413GB free
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 305 302 303 304 303 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 476
Mixed 354
SusWrite 324
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 43.8
151% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 252
200% 278 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 171 174 168 159 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 143
Mixed 86
SusWrite 169
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
829GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 138 138 135 134 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 125
Write 75.2
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 137
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.3
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
393GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 150 153 147 139 184 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 120
Mixed 84.1
SusWrite 152
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3400C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 29.8
100% 34.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 37.6
SC Mixed 26.5
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Professional Gaming

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $918
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback