Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 212%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics225% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '22 at 14:55
Run Duration320 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT-$320
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.25 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Memory 83.6
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
93% 172 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 1,026
96% 800 Pts
64-Core 1,552
96% 1,552 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Gigabyte(1458 4043) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 5025 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Lighting 334
Reflection 323
Parallax 349
272% 336 fps
MRender 376
Gravity 276
Splatting 199
223% 284 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 225%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 34 28 9 53 4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 458
Write 347
Mixed 327
SusWrite 68.1
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 19.3
79% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 56.5
DQ Mixed 41
42% 71.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 56%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
870GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3313 3326 3323 2479 1628 1669 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
427% Outstanding
Read 2,786
Write 3,299
Mixed 3,032
SusWrite 2,623
664% 2,935 MB/s
4K Read 78.2
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 108
349% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,256
DQ Write 849
DQ Mixed 1,037
778% 1,047 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 427%
Great: 488%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
260GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 186 79 80 79 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 506
Write 455
Mixed 401
SusWrite 159
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 47.4
153% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 219
165% 221 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 121%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
473GB free
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2193 2192 2184 2202 1663 269 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 1,742
Write 2,278
Mixed 1,892
SusWrite 1,784
436% 1,924 MB/s
4K Read 60.8
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 84.8
282% 99.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,250
DQ Write 941
DQ Mixed 1048
796% 1,080 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 315%
Great: 365%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
66GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 69 60 57 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 80
Write 72.3
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 65.3
49% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.6% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 20.8
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 22.5
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,067
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback