Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 200%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 203%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics213% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive41.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '22 at 13:43
Run Duration312 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT-$320
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Memory 84.5
1-Core 154
2-Core 306
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 1,021
98% 806 Pts
64-Core 1,553
96% 1,553 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Gigabyte(1458 4043) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
213% Outstanding
Lighting 315
Reflection 302
Parallax 325
257% 314 fps
MRender 360
Gravity 258
Splatting 183
209% 267 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 213%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 65 4.5 4.1 23 4.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 457
Write 356
Mixed 324
SusWrite 60
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 18.9
61% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 56%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
875GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3319 3322 3314 2441 1634 1700 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
428% Outstanding
Read 2,771
Write 3,298
Mixed 3017
SusWrite 2,621
662% 2,927 MB/s
4K Read 80.1
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 106
352% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,281
DQ Write 859
DQ Mixed 1,060
794% 1,067 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 428%
Great: 488%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
271GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 244 78 81 80 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 454
Mixed 407
SusWrite 169
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 48.6
167% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 220
165% 223 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 121%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
479GB free
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2186 2183 2184 2187 1697 250 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 1,754
Write 2,243
Mixed 1909
SusWrite 1,781
435% 1,922 MB/s
4K Read 61
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 85.3
285% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1280
DQ Write 933
DQ Mixed 1,054
802% 1,089 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 317%
Great: 365%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
67GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 72 70 71 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 77.5
Write 65.5
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 70.8
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.3% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 20.6
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 22.2
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,065
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback