Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 198%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 200%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics213% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '22 at 12:35
Run Duration318 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT-$320
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Memory 84.2
1-Core 155
2-Core 304
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 976
94% 777 Pts
64-Core 1,562
97% 1,562 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Gigabyte(1458 4043) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
213% Outstanding
Lighting 314
Reflection 303
Parallax 348
256% 322 fps
MRender 358
Gravity 258
Splatting 192
212% 269 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 213%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 21 32 80 113 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 461
Write 358
Mixed 288
SusWrite 114
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 19
76% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 98
DQ Write 57.9
DQ Mixed 41.5
41% 65.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 56%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
878GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3360 3366 3366 2255 1715 1719 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
442% Outstanding
Read 2,967
Write 3,364
Mixed 3084
SusWrite 2,630
680% 3,011 MB/s
4K Read 81.5
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 112
365% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1,306
DQ Write 862
DQ Mixed 1,071
802% 1,080 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 442%
Great: 488%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
271GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 255 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 459
Mixed 409
SusWrite 172
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 49.2
169% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 220
165% 222 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 121%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
481GB free
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2226 2226 2228 2232 1226 241 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 1,731
Write 2,209
Mixed 1,905
SusWrite 1,730
429% 1,894 MB/s
4K Read 62
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 86.9
290% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,305
DQ Write 936
DQ Mixed 1,078
817% 1,106 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 315%
Great: 365%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
67GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 78.4
Write 80.6
Mixed 46
SusWrite 70.7
51% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.7% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 21.3
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 23.5
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,067
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback