Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 209%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics227% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '22 at 14:04
Run Duration318 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT-$320
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 85.1
1-Core 155
2-Core 306
98% 182 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 1034
91% 775 Pts
64-Core 1,543
96% 1,543 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Gigabyte(1458 4043) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 5025 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
227% Outstanding
Lighting 338
Reflection 323
Parallax 350
276% 337 fps
MRender 375
Gravity 280
Splatting 200
224% 285 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 227%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 3.4 36 117 70 16 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 448
Write 362
Mixed 178
SusWrite 75.5
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 17.7
76% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 96.4
DQ Write 83.5
DQ Mixed 41
44% 73.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 56%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
870GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3337 3349 3340 2276 1648 1709 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
431% Outstanding
Read 2,776
Write 3,363
Mixed 3,053
SusWrite 2,610
667% 2,950 MB/s
4K Read 79.7
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 108
357% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,318
DQ Write 884
DQ Mixed 1,090
816% 1,097 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 431%
Great: 488%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
260GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 216 81 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 444
Mixed 404
SusWrite 164
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 98.6
4K Mixed 48.7
168% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 219
165% 222 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 121%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
473GB free
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2208 2200 2213 2208 1308 273 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 1,746
Write 2231
Mixed 1,894
SusWrite 1,735
430% 1,901 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 86.9
289% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1319
DQ Write 947
DQ Mixed 1,088
825% 1,118 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 316%
Great: 365%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
66GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 71 70 71 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 80
Write 83
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 70.7
52% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.8% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 20.8
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 22.8
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,067
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback