Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 02 '22 at 02:34
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 42.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 217
62% 121 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 332
52% 373 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1242 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
47.8% Average
Lighting 61.2
Reflection 58
Parallax 78.4
50% 65.9 fps
MRender 56.8
Gravity 64.7
Splatting 42.9
44% 54.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 45 63 43 61 40 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.1% Poor
Read 226
Write 106
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 68.2
27% 123 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 11.6
50% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 15.4
DQ Write 16.5
DQ Mixed 15.6
12% 15.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 102%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 25 11 10 9.7 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 125
Write 29.5
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 15.6
59% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.5
113% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 28%
Hitachi HTS545016B9SA00 160GB
69GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 26 28 29 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 24.2
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 28.2
33% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 15%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB
7GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 13 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
9.22% Terrible
Read 29.2
Write 11.7
Mixed 8.9
SusWrite 12.7
18% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
35% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.22%
Great: 10%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
3GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
2.55% Terrible
Read 9.9
Write 0.7
Mixed 2
SusWrite 1.1
3% 3.42 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
16% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.55%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2666 DDR4 3200 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
59.5% Above average
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 21
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 17.3
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,070 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $347
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback