| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 22.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200714 |
| Uptime | 2.2 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 29 '22 at 07:53 |
| Run Duration | 213 Seconds |
| Run User | MEX-User |
| Background CPU | 17% |
PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.8%
Good
|
65% 122 Pts
|
52% 390 Pts
|
25% 406 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.14
|
12.4%
Very poor
|
13% 18 fps
|
12% 14.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 41 64 45 66 45 MB/s
|
22.8%
Poor
|
21% 94.1 MB/s
|
42% 13.3 MB/s
|
11% 14.9 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi HTS545016B9SA00 160GB
12GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 34 33 34 34 MB/s
|
15.3%
Very poor
|
37% 27.8 MB/s
|
56% 0.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata DDR4 2666 DDR4 3200 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
53.3%
Above average
|
54% 18.9 GB/s
|
52% 18.1 GB/s
|
28% 142 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,112 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $69
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 1,470x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 1,308x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 1,008x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 955x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 738x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 657x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 100% - Outstanding | Total price: $345 |