Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '22 at 05:37
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 66.9
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 114
50% 82 Pts
4-Core 141
8-Core 171
20% 156 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.14
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 20.7
10% 13.2 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 13.3
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$39
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 28 3.7 2.4 5.2 45 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.9% Below average
Read 279
Write 91.1
Mixed 158
SusWrite 40.1
31% 142 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 21
4K Mixed 14.2
44% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 39.5
DQ Mixed 27.2
34% 61.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 53%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
650GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 133 147 142 137 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 147
Write 138
Mixed 92
SusWrite 140
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
35.4% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 9.3
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback