MSI X299 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A90)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A90
MotherboardMSI X299 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A90)  (all builds)
Memory57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '22 at 15:16
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7740X-$130
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 244
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 784
79% 641 Pts
64-Core 780
48% 780 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 189
Parallax 177
138% 179 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 178
Splatting 124
118% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CT500P 500GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 52 44 223 140 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,447
Write 914
Mixed 885
SusWrite 90.5
185% 834 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 84
305% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 65.1
DQ Mixed 78.3
90% 162 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 167%
Great: 243%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
441GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 482 485 491 482 481 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 483
Mixed 407
SusWrite 481
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 65.7
214% 74.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 132%
Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
443GB free
Firmware: EXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2285 621 629 628 627 627 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 2,360
Write 1,783
Mixed 1,748
SusWrite 903
379% 1,699 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 91.2
300% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,500
DQ Write 1,201
DQ Mixed 1,346
1,009% 1,349 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 303%
Great: 340%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
470GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 482 484 490 481 480 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 485
Mixed 361
SusWrite 480
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 50
171% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 176
178% 289 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 118%
Great: 118%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
317GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 158 163 161 164 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 126
Mixed 31
SusWrite 161
86% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 30.3
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 26.4
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 59.4
67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A90) Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X299 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A90)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $944
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback