MSI X299 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A90)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A90
MotherboardMSI X299 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A90)  (all builds)
Memory57.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '22 at 21:17
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7740X-$130
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 92.2
1-Core 138
2-Core 262
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 625
68% 540 Pts
64-Core 758
47% 758 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 184
Parallax 170
137% 174 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 174
Splatting 121
115% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CT500P 500GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 271 38 44 46 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 1,297
Write 827
Mixed 99.3
SusWrite 92.8
126% 579 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 45.8
176% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 43.9
DQ Mixed 78.2
86% 153 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 120%
Great: 243%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
441GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 463 479 473 485 481 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 476
Mixed 403
SusWrite 472
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 65
219% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 133%
Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
443GB free
Firmware: EXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2285 625 629 628 610 627 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 2,253
Write 2050
Mixed 1,506
SusWrite 901
375% 1,678 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 84.3
284% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,433
DQ Write 1158
DQ Mixed 1,290
967% 1,294 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 291%
Great: 340%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
470GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 461 478 472 483 480 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 482
Mixed 362
SusWrite 470
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 45.3
168% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 175
178% 289 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 116%
Great: 118%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
317GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 132 158 157 159 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 146
Write 161
Mixed 31
SusWrite 151
88% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 107%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
53GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 6.1 7.6 7.8 8.7 9.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 10
Mixed 11
SusWrite 8.1
16% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3.6
222% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 30.2
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 28.1
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A90) Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X299 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A90)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $944
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback