MSI X299 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A90)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A90
MotherboardMSI X299 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A90)  (all builds)
Memory57.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 21 '22 at 14:45
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7740X-$130
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 134
2-Core 275
87% 162 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 506
60% 465 Pts
64-Core 664
41% 664 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 188
Parallax 194
140% 184 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 180
Splatting 124
118% 147 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CT500P 500GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 51 55 216 51 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 1,110
Write 189
Mixed 91
SusWrite 77.9
78% 367 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 38
139% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 56
DQ Mixed 41.5
64% 128 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 243%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
441GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 445 476 467 486 487 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 441
Mixed 396
SusWrite 465
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 51.2
161% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
443GB free
Firmware: EXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1629 997 623 629 629 630 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 2,036
Write 1,706
Mixed 1,401
SusWrite 856
335% 1,500 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 77.2
244% 85.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,153
DQ Write 1,048
DQ Mixed 1,186
866% 1,129 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 259%
Great: 340%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
470GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 479 477 483 482 425 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 458
Mixed 352
SusWrite 472
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 34.3
132% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 181
179% 288 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 103%
Great: 118%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
317GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 141 138 122 139 135 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 21.5
Write 132
Mixed 24
SusWrite 136
57% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.3
77% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
93% Outstanding
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 29.9
98% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 24.3
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A90) Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X299 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A90)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $944
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback