MSI X299 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A90)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A90
MotherboardMSI X299 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A90)  (all builds)
Memory56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '22 at 22:04
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7740X-$130
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 142
2-Core 291
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 749
76% 613 Pts
64-Core 702
43% 702 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 185
Parallax 178
136% 176 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 176
Splatting 124
117% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CT500P 500GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 92 27 22 28 16 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.3% Average
Read 254
Write 178
Mixed 150
SusWrite 58.8
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 26.5
93% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 78.4
DQ Write 84.7
DQ Mixed 68.1
55% 77.1 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 243%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
441GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 475 469 487 489 481 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 487
Mixed 416
SusWrite 476
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 66.3
225% 80 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 135%
Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
443GB free
Firmware: EXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2274 625 625 627 625 626 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 2,538
Write 2,356
Mixed 1,744
SusWrite 900
421% 1,885 MB/s
4K Read 69.6
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 83.1
308% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,422
DQ Write 966
DQ Mixed 1299
941% 1,229 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 304%
Great: 340%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
470GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 474 468 486 488 481 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 487
Mixed 366
SusWrite 475
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 50
178% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 180
180% 291 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 120%
Great: 118%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
317GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 159 157 159 157 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 152
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 156
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 107%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
53GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 6.1 7.3 7.4 8.7 8.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 24.5
Write 6.2
Mixed 12.3
SusWrite 7.8
15% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 3.5
194% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 30.9
100% 34.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 43.3
SC Mixed 28.4
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A90) Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X299 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A90)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $944
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback