Monster ABRA A7 V9.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster ABRA A7 V9.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A7 V9.2
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180821
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '22 at 17:24
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 89.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 237
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 657
69% 552 Pts
64-Core 777
48% 777 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 872B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6230
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
30.6% Below average
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 37.9
32% 39.3 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 40.1
Splatting 27.2
28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HAJQ-00000 256GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT2300Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 289 269 286 171 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 400
Mixed 367
SusWrite 258
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 50.3
168% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 346
261% 350 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 102%
Great: 111%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
647GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 112 115 116 117 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 45.2
Write 42.9
Mixed 46.9
SusWrite 112
45% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.6
171% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CT8G4SFS824A.C8FBR1 04CB 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.2% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 22.1
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 24
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A7 V9.2 Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A7 V9.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback