HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 166F
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110830
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 08 '22 at 12:24
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2350M
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 84.8
1-Core 59.8
2-Core 110
54% 84.7 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 151
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
HP(103C 166F) 774MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
1.45% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 1
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.37 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2.2
2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.45%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
779GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 59 34 52 63 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 49.1
Write 94
Mixed 59
SusWrite 49.8
47% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.4
105% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
25.8% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 7.6
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 0.1
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion g6 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 3,249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback