Performance Results

Gaming 27%
Desktop 48%
Workstation 22%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics64.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 36% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GE63 Raider RGB 8RF
MotherboardMSI MS-16P5  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 22 '22 at 14:13
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 36%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 53.6
1-Core 34.3
2-Core 61.3
33% 49.7 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 185
18% 146 Pts
64-Core 233
14% 233 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1214) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver.
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64.4% Good
Lighting 75.9
Reflection 93.6
Parallax 81.4
62% 83.6 fps
MRender 87
Gravity 78.6
Splatting 87.1
69% 84.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HAJQ-00000 256GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT2300Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 280 152 72 75 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 415
Write 354
Mixed 368
SusWrite 159
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 25.6
81% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 177
130% 172 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 111%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 336 359 331 384 387 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 317
Write 323
Mixed 244
SusWrite 356
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 23.9
4K Mixed 20.8
63% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 83.4
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 85
66% 89.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
912GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 170 175 172 170 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 127
Write 147
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 170
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
44.2% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 17.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16P5 Builds (Compare 1,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop 78%
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P5

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback