Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PH315-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Sienta_CFS
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '22 at 17:12
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.2% Average
Memory 44.4
1-Core 62.7
2-Core 121
43% 76.1 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 367
35% 291 Pts
64-Core 483
30% 483 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1262) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.68% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 7.3
5% 18.1 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.68%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 116 121 113 115 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 381
Write 130
Mixed 144
SusWrite 116
42% 193 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 16.8
66% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 121
112% 176 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 70%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
922GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 118 119 119 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 120
Write 125
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 119
71% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
28.5% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 9
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 183
22% 183 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-51 Builds (Compare 3,919 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback