User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics85.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-8M-F
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210915
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '22 at 22:50
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 103
2-Core 201
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 793
71% 599 Pts
64-Core 2,036
126% 2,036 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
Gigabyte(1458 402B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.2% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 97.1
Parallax 108
87% 104 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 101
Splatting 84
82% 103 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S501/128GB 128GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103F0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 228 181 154 188 120 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 1,371
Write 553
Mixed 327
SusWrite 179
132% 608 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 15.2
111% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 398
DQ Write 40.4
DQ Mixed 210
156% 216 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 107%
Great: 175%
Kingston SA400S37/480G 480GB
310GB free
Firmware: 71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 359 15 16 387 385 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 437
Write 374
Mixed 339
SusWrite 260
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 19.2
95% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 41.8
80% 152 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
398GB free
Firmware: SD81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0.2 0.5 45 9.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 92.3
Write 5.2
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 9.2
20% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
72% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 23.9
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.4
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback