User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics86.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-8M-F
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210915
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 31 '22 at 23:18
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 223
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 792
72% 604 Pts
64-Core 2,076
128% 2,076 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
Gigabyte(1458 402B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.6% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 94.1
Parallax 108
87% 103 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 104
Splatting 85.7
85% 107 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S501/128GB 128GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103F0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 543 561 509 282 83 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 1,482
Write 520
Mixed 607
SusWrite 347
162% 739 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 23
143% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 404
DQ Write 509
DQ Mixed 336
287% 417 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 142%
Great: 175%
Kingston SA400S37/480G 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: 71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 406 402 396 400 394 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 432
Write 381
Mixed 333
SusWrite 403
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 17.7
98% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 41.7
83% 161 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
397GB free
Firmware: SD81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 107 107 106 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 100
Write 98.1
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 107
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.9% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 24.8
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback