User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics85.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-8M-F
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210915
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '22 at 19:23
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 220
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 765
70% 584 Pts
64-Core 2,087
129% 2,087 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
Gigabyte(1458 402B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.7% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 93.9
Parallax 107
86% 102 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 103
Splatting 83
84% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S501/128GB 128GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103F0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 532 552 528 268 94 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 1,419
Write 524
Mixed 601
SusWrite 344
159% 722 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 19.1
131% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 399
DQ Write 517
DQ Mixed 334
287% 417 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 136%
Great: 175%
Kingston SA400S37/480G 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: 71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 395 394 388 388 389 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 431
Write 374
Mixed 333
SusWrite 394
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 17.1
92% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 40
84% 164 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
398GB free
Firmware: SD81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 102 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 106
Write 39.6
Mixed 55.1
SusWrite 102
56% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 24.7
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 18.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 74%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback