ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battleship	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 82% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	86.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HUANANZHI
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-8M-F
Memory	28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210915
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 31 '22 at 23:05
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4 192 User benchmarks, average bench 75% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	77.7% Very good	Memory 79 1-Core 110 2-Core 222 76% 137 Pts	4-Core 410 8-Core 796 72% 603 Pts	64-Core 2,082 129% 2,082 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 402B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.23 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	86.3% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 94.4 Parallax 108 87% 103 fps	MRender 131 Gravity 104 Splatting 83.8 84% 106 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fanxiang S501/128GB 128GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 133% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: T1103F0L SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 291 258 277 506 216 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	Read 1349 Write 541 Mixed 620 SusWrite 321 156% 708 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 93.6 4K Mixed 19 122% 48.2 MB/s	DQ Read 397 DQ Write 504 DQ Mixed 338 286% 413 MB/s
Poor: 115% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 175%
Kingston SA400S37/480G 480GB 269 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 447GB free Firmware: 71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 402 398 399 406 396 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	78.4% Very good	Read 434 Write 384 Mixed 335 SusWrite 403 88% 389 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 66.6 4K Mixed 17.4 92% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 313 DQ Mixed 41.6 80% 153 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80 27,325 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 397GB free Firmware: SD81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 107 107 107 108 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Read 101 Write 98.9 Mixed 51.9 SusWrite 106 66% 89.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 59%
SAMSUNG HM320JI 320GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 105GB free, PID 2339 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 37 37 37 36 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Read 36.4 Write 30.6 Mixed 27.4 SusWrite 36.5 44% 32.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GB 1,132 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74% Very good	MC Read 30.6 MC Write 27.5 MC Mixed 24.8 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 18.8 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 82.4 49% 82.4 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback